Passages
From The Text
|
Pg #
|
Comments
& Questions
|
“She did understand, or at least understood
that she was supposed to understand. She understood, and said nothing about
it, and prayed for the power to forgive and did forgive. But he can’t have
found living with her forgiveness all that easy. Breakfast in a haze of
forgiveness: coffee with forgiveness, porridge with forgiveness, forgiveness
on the buttered toast. He would have been helpless against it, for how can
you repudiate against something that is never spoken... She wished him to owe
his recovery to her alone- to her care, to her tireless devotion. That’s the
other side of selflessness: its tyranny.”
|
77
|
(R) It’s amazing how Atwood can make something
such as forgiveness, something that’s usually viewed as an admirable virtue,
into a jail. Though, people always seem to want what they can’t have. If the
man had been greeted with anger he would think ‘You don’t understand.” Yet,
when shown understanding, however fake it may be, and given a heaping plate
of forgiveness, it seems wrong.
I thought the last line was interesting
though. (“That’s the…tyranny.”) Could that be true? Caring nothing about yourself,
caring everything about other people… wouldn't the person who’s being cared
about so wholly start feeling as if they owe you something? If you deny that
person anything, you would seem heartless. Biting the hand that works so hard
to keep you happy. I kind of feel
suffocated just imagining it.
|
Thursday, October 11, 2012
Dialectical Journal #26:The Blind Assassin
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment