Passages
From The Text
|
Pg #
|
Comments
& Questions
|
·
“This teaming up with the Career wolf pack to
hunt down the rest of us. No one from District 12 would think of doing such a
thing! Career tributes are overly vicious, arrogant, better fed, but only because
they are the Capitol’s lapdogs. Universally, solidly hated by all but those
from their own districts. I can imagine the things their saying about him
back home now. And Peeta had the gall to talk to me about disgrace?
·
Obviously, the noble boy on the rooftop was
playing just one more game with me. But this will be his last. I will eagerly
watch the night skies for signs of his death, if I don’t kill him first
myself."
|
·
162
|
·
(E) It’s things like this that make me truly
dislike Katniss. I know there wasn’t really a way for her to know that Peeta
was just tricking the Careers, but she should have more faith in the boy! In
the passage before this one, she was hoping that wherever Peeta was he was
ok, then in about 10 seconds she’s willing to kill him herself! She’s ridiculous!
I can understand why she was so surprised about Peeta’s love confession and
didn’t even believe it until the end of the book. They are polar opposites-
Peeta is kind, considerate, generous and an empathizer. Katniss is none of
these. The only people she really cares about are
Gale, her sister and mother (kind of). Other than that she tends to keep
people at a distance. And Peeta does not deserve that! The only reason I
wanted Peeta and Katniss to end up together by the end of the book series is
so Peeta would be happy.
|
Wednesday, September 5, 2012
Dialectical Journal #7: The Hunger Games
Assignment 4: Krapps Last Tape
The most significant part in the
play for me is the end. In this part,
Krapp has just finished listening to the tape he made when he was 39, it was
made 30 years ago, and then starts a new tape. “Just been listening to that
stupid bastard I took myself for 30 years ago, hard to believe I was ever as
bad as that. Thank God that’s all done anyway.” The reason I chose that part
was because even though Krapp is now 69 and seems to detest the man he was when
he made that tape recording, he appears to be the same. Over the tape he talks
about his problem with bananas and alcohol (“Have just eaten I regret to say
three bananas and with difficulty refrained from a forth. Fatal things for a
man with my condition. Cut it out!’’) and how he should put an end to those
habits but thirty years later he is still doing the same thing. “Krapp switches
off [tape recorder], broods, looks at his watch, gets up, goes backstage into
darkness. Ten seconds. Pop of a cork. Ten seconds. Second cork. Ten seconds.
Third cork.”
Krapp is the only character in this
play. He is very strange; he doesn’t seem to be mentally stable. I find his
ability to stay the same over such a long period of time astonishing. He is a
little different than he was at 39, but he seems to be essentially the same
person. Samuel Beckett is the author of this play and he did a very good job
writing this. Even though the 39 and 69 year old Krapps each talked about very
different subjects on their tapes, during very different times in their life,
the style in which they speak is the same in both. The Krapps’ both seem to
lose their thoughts mid-sentence and are always pausing throughout their
dialogues. It’s almost as if Krapp was frozen in time. In the play Krapp
replays a certain part of the tape he made when he was 39 numerous times, giving
the audience the feeling that even though he acted as though he is better now than
he was then, he would give anything to be able to have that experience again. “We
lay there without moving. But under us all moved, and moved us, gently up and
down, and from side to side. (Pause) Past midnight. Never knew such silence. The
earth might be inhabitited. (Pause) Here I end-(Krapp switches off, winds tape
back, Switches on again)”
The authors’ use of stage
directions adds a lot more to the story. They allow the readers to see how spastic and weird Krapp is through his movements."He turns, advances to edge of stage, halts, strokes banana, peels it, drops skin
at his feet, puts end of banana in his mouth and remains motionless, staring
vacuously before him. Finally he bites off the end, turns aside and begins
pacing to and fro at edge of stage, in the light, i.e. not more than four or
five paces either way, meditatively eating banana. He treads on skin, slips,
nearly falls, recovers himself, stoops and peers at skin and finally pushes it,
still stooping, with his foot over the edge of the stage into pit." The stage directions allow the readers the ability to imagine the way the character's mannerisms and actions. They, along with the writing, help to thoroughly bring Krapp to life.
Monday, September 3, 2012
Dialectical Journal #6: Candide
Passages
From The Text
|
Pg #
|
Comments
& Questions
|
·
“’Whatever shall be, shall be,’ said Candide. ‘But
one thing consoles me. I see that people one never thought to see again often
do turn up. It may well turn out that, having run into my red sheep and
Paquette, I will also run into Cunegonde.’
·
‘I wish,’ said Martin, ‘that she may one day
make you very happy. But I very much doubt she will.’
·
‘You’re a bit hard,’ said Candide
·
‘That’s because I’ve lived,’ said Martin
|
·
78
|
·
(R) I don’t understand what Voltaire has
against optimism. Candide wasn’t even going all crazy like before, he was
just thinking happily about his future. But then Voltaire had to go and bring
him down. Or perhaps it’s foreshadowing! I wouldn’t be surprised if by the
time Candide and Cunegonde end up together (if they ever do), they would be
miserable. That girl is just too much trouble and I doubt Voltaire would let
Candide live happily ever after anyway.
|
Friday, August 31, 2012
Dialectical Journal #5: Candide
|
Passages
From The Text
|
Pg #
|
Comments
& Questions
|
|
‘“Who’, asked Candide, ‘was the fat pig who
was telling me so many bad things about the play I cried such a lot at, and
about those actors I liked so much?’
‘He is evil incarnate,’ replied the abbe. ‘He
earns his living by decrying all new plays and books. He hates the
up-and-coming writer, just as eunuchs hate the up-and-coming lover. He’s one
of those vipers of literature that feeds off filth and venom. He’s a hack.’
‘What do you mean by hack?’
‘I mean’, said the abbe, ‘someone who churns
out articles by the dozen, a Freron.’”
|
65
|
(R) Voltaire wrote this satire because he disagreed
with the view of German philosopher, Leibnitz, that this world is the “best
of all possible worlds.” He thought that statement was ludicrous, so he
decided to write a book that shows just how crazy Voltaire finds that point
of view to be. What I find interesting is, while writing this book that is
supposed to make fun of Leibnitz’s theory, he also uses it as an opportunity to
make jabs at other people. According to the back of my book, a Freron is not
some kind of archaic insult. It’s actually a person. “Elie Freron (1718-76),
an implacable and not always unjustified critic of Voltaire.” I think it’s funny
how he took this book as an opportunity to mock all the people who annoy him.
Killing two birds with one stone, I guess.
|
Thursday, August 30, 2012
Dialectical Journal #4: Candide
Passages
From The Text
|
Pg #
|
Comments
& Questions
|
·
‘“We have the wherewithal to pay the Governor
of Buenos Aires now, ‘ [Candide] said,’ if a price can be put on Miss
Cunegonde, that is. Let’s head for Cayenne and take ship there and then we’ll
see what kingdom we’re going to buy.”’
|
·
52
|
·
(R) Candide and his servant are leaving
Eldorado. Voluntarily! The one place they weren’t kicked out of or had to
flee for their lives, they choose to leave so that they can brag about the
riches they got and get back Candide’s lover. I don’t understand Candide at
all. He’s always talking about the “best all worlds’ but when he finally
finds it, he leaves it behind.
|
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Dialectical Journal #3: Candide
|
Passages
From The Text
|
Pg #
|
Comments
& Questions
|
|
“‘What is this place,' said one to the other, ‘which
is unknown to the rest of the world and where nature of things is so
different from ours? It’s probably the place where all goes well, for there
absolutely must be such a place. And whatever Maitre Pangloss might have
said, I often observed that everything went rather badly in Westphalia.”’
|
47
|
(R) I’m not sure, but I think Candide may be
growing as a character. At the very beginning of this book he believed his
country-Westphalia-to be the best of all places and whatnot but here he
admits that it is not that great. I also think that Voltaire might be trying
to tell the audience something with this scene. Candide is currently in
Eldorado, a fictional place, and is essentially saying that this might be the
“best of all possible worlds”. Perhaps Voltaire is saying believing that this
world is the best of them all as delusional as the belief that Eldorado
exists? Even if there is a best of all worlds, why would this one be it? What
other worlds are we comparing ours’ to? I can kind of understand why Voltaire
would feel so moved to write a satire about that sentiment. This book has
gotten a little better. It’s still pretty weird and creepy though. (This
woman got one of her butt cheeks eaten!)
|
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
Dialectical Journal #2: Candide (ugh)
Passages
From The Text
|
Pg #
|
Comments
& Questions
|
“’Well, here’s a fine mess’ said Cunegonde. ‘There’s
no going back now. That’s us excommunicated. Our last hour has come. How is
it that someone as soft-hearted as you can have ended up killing a Jew and a
prelate in a matter of minutes?’
‘My dear girl,’ replied Candide, ‘when a man’s
in love, jealous, and flogged by the Inquisition, there’s no knowing what he
may do’’’
|
22
|
(R) Yesterday, I was actually looking forward
to reading this book. That was before I realized something very important and
that, my dear English teacher, is that this book is extremely stupid. As
Merrick has told me about 5 times, this book is a ”refutation of optimism”. Hence
the second name, “Optimism”. I just have no idea how anyone in this book is optimistic.
They all seem crazy about this world being the “best of all possible worlds” (which i can understand why Voltaire found annoying. Honestly, this world is pretty horrible. In fact, it would be pretty depressing to think this is the best of all possible worlds) and junk, but they don't really seem to hope for the best Maybe it's because they believe that everything that happens IS for the best. Even though everything that you wouldn't want to happen to you has happened to the couple speaking in the passage. By this part, though, they don't seem to believe in that "everything's for the best" opinion as much by this point ("I wonder why?" this blogger sarcastically thinks). Voltaire must really hate that kind of thinking. otherwise, why waste so much time writing a really dumb (forgive me literary police!) book?
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)