Tuesday, August 27, 2019

Trump + White Supremacy = Tragedy

Trumps Dog Whistle was Heard Loud & Clear 
the response just wasn’t what he was expecting 
Proverbs 15:1 

On July 14 of this summer, Donald Trump sent out a tweet stating that four Democratic House Representatives should go back to their countries. It didn’t matter that three of those four women he had singled out were born in the U.S, and all of them are citizens of this country. It didn’t even matter that those sentiments don’t just apply to those women; they apply to every American who may have a tie to another country and is also passionate about the way America can change for the better. The statement wasn’t really meant to cause harm, to alienate or to enrage, though it did all those things. Once emotions subside, it is easy to see the statements for what they truly were: a dog whistle. 

Trump made those statements to remind his people that he is still very much on their side. He wanted to reassure them that, despite the way things may look at the moment, he has their best interest at heart. Whether Trump himself is a white supremacist is something which can be hotly contested. However, it is undeniably clear that he is a White nationalist sympathizer.  He only speaks against White Nationalism and its insidious ideology when backed against a corner. When he feels no real pressure though, he makes the sort statements he made concerning he violence in Charlottesville. As has been shown since before he even ran for office, Trump speaks rather recklessly, without any regard for how his words might affect something on a large scale. He tends to say things for the immediacy of it; for example, sending out insulting tweets. It’s to cause injury to a specific individual at a point in time. This is the reason why he appears to have no recollection of, or straight up denies making, certain comments he’s made when they are brought back up by reporters some days later. His words are for the here and now, that’s it. Once they are out of his mouth, they’re forgotten. However, the tragic event of this past weekend shows Trumps words are not so easily forgotten by others. 

A young man, the age of 21, left his home and drove over 8 hours to massacre people he didn’t know. He didn’t need to know them. He knew they would most likely be Hispanic, given the demographic of the area he had traveled to. That was enough.  This young man is a White nationalist, one driven to commit a large scale act of violence. It would be remiss to forget the history of this nation, so this is not the first time oblivious, innocent people have died for nothing more than being born the “wrong” race. It is, perhaps, the first time in very recent history where a person committing such an act could reasonably believe they had the sitting presidents’ support. 

Did Trump directly influence this young man to carry out such an atrocious act? No, most likely not. What Trump has done though, is poked at the festering wound this nation has. Poke at it long enough, and it will flare up. Unfortunately, the flare up aren’t pretty and can manifest itself in a number of ways. As has been shown throughout history, violence is the most common. Whether Trump truly believes in the ideology of White Supremacy is moot. He enables and emboldens those who do. Trump is an accomplice, if not a culprit. Either way, he is still guilty.

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Book Club #9: C, TBC

Passages From The Text
Pg #
Comments & Questions
·         “They are silent in the Court. And the judge too is silent. There is no sound there No one coughs or moves or sighs. The Judge speaks:
·          
·         This Court finds you guilty Absolom Kumalo of the murder of Arthur Trevelyan Jarvis at his residence in Parkwold on the afternoon of the eighth day of October 194. And this Court finds you Matthew Kumalo and Johannes Pafuri not guilty and you are accordingly discharged.
·         So these two go down the stairs into the place that is under the ground and leave the other alone. He looks at them going perhaps he is thinking, now it is I alone.”
235-36

·         (R)  I know that I am supposed to read at least 20 pages between each blog entry, Ms. English Teacher, but I really wanted to write about this part! I’m surprised that Absolom was found guilty; I thought this book would be like a comic-the “good” guys win and the bad guys lose. Except Absolom is a bad guy- I think he deserves to be punished. I do think that hanging him is a bit much though. Anyway, the author seems to try hard to portray Abolom as some wayward youth who is actually a great boy inside. He’s just made some bad decisions! Nonetheless, the author sent him off to be hanged and let his “friends” go off free. But due to the evidence that was given, that was exactly what should have happened. I felt that the reasoning behind the ruling was very sound. I feel very bad for Kumalo though. He left his life in the village, his wife also,  and used up a bunch of his resources to find out that his son is a thief and now, a killer. I wonder, does he sometimes think that he should have stayed in Ndotenshi?

Monday, February 18, 2013

Book Club #8: C, TBC

Passages From The Text
Pg #
Comments & Questions
·         “But at the first sign of disorder, John Kumalo will be brought down and put in the van and taken to some other place. And what will happen to the carpenter’s shop, that brings in eight, ten, twelve ponds a week? What will happen to the talks in the carpenter’s ship, where men come from every part of the country to listen to him?
·         There are some men who long for martyrdom, there are those who know that to go to  would bring greatness to them, there are those who would go to prison not caring if it brought them greatness or not. But John Kumalo is not one of them. There is no applause in prison.”
219-20

·         (R) So, John Kumalo is a man with a great voice who has the power to really move people but chooses not to because he doesn’t want to get arrested and go to jail. Also, he would miss the praise far too much. So, the author is trying to tell me that John is just a bad guy all around. He doesn’t care about anyone’s interest except his own. I get it, Paton.

Sunday, February 17, 2013

Book Club #7: C, TBC

Passages From The Text
Pg #
Comments & Questions
·         “-Why did you carry this revolver?
·         -It was to frighten the servant of the house.
·         -But why do you carry any revolver?
 The boy is silent
       -You must answer my question.
-They told me to carry it.
-Who told you?
-No they told me Johannesburg was dangerous.
-Who told you?
The boy is silent.”

194

·         (R) Absolom Kumalo’s trial has started. He is pleading not guilty against murder because he says that he did not “intend” to murder Arthur Jarvis. I think he’s lying. I don’t understand how they knocked out the servant with no problem but had to shoot the guy to get him down. Couldn’t they have fought him or something? Hasn’t Absolom and his crew done this kind of thievery before? Whenever people appear there first instinct is to shoot? I don’t believe it.